Please refer to the failed unemployment extension as H.R. 4213
|
I like the idea of knowing how to discuss legislation in legislatures that account to me by the bill number. A few responsible journalistic enterprises report the bill number , but most do not — no broadcast concerns come to my mind. Wouldn’t you figure that my favorite whipping boy voted against it, too? Cornhuskers must be blessed to be perpetually healthy and employed. |
from the washington post - not noted as a bastion of liberal thought/argument:
…conclusions: 1. the actual number of available jobs is demonstrably smaller than it used to be, by a significant magnitude. 2. the jobs that would need to be created to turn this around and bring up employment…
21 notes
-
telegantmess likes this
-
jakke likes this
-
oldaw likes this
-
bebrightasyellow likes this
-
silas216 reblogged this from abbyjean
-
politicore likes this
-
apatosaurus likes this
-
itsandyking likes this
-
diegueno reblogged this from abbyjean and added:
oc_host_url = "http://www.opencongress.org/"; oc_bill_id = "111-h4213"; oc_frame_height = "290"; oc_bgcolor = "ffff00";...
-
andymartin likes this
-
awomansplace reblogged this from abbyjean
-
undercovernun likes this
-
luria-p likes this
-
jeffrosie likes this
-
bronwynlewis likes this
-
diegueno likes this
-
makelatkesnotwar likes this
-
blackamazon likes this
-
se-smith likes this
-
bespangled likes this
-
trxfreely likes this
-
abbyjean posted this
